Weather 
Washington — The Senate on Thursday rejected a Democratic effort aimed at permanently blocking the Justice Department’s “anti-weaponization” fund, defeating an amendment at the start of a marathon vote series on funding for immigration enforcement.
Republicans are pushing ahead with a roughly $70 billion package to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol using reconciliation, which avoids the need for Democratic votes to move forward.
After a series of fits and starts over President Trump’s White House ballroom and the Justice Department’s fund, the chamber began a so-called “vote-a-rama” Thursday morning that was still ongoing as of the early morning hours Friday. Senators can offer an unlimited number of amendments and require the chamber to cast vote after vote.
The Democrats’ gambit to eliminate the fund failed in a 49 to 50 vote on an amendment that kicked off the vote series. The amendment would have sent the funding package back to the Judiciary Committee, with instructions to prevent money from going to the DOJ fund. Three Republicans, Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Jon Husted of Ohio and Dan Sullivan of Alaska, joined Democrats in favor of the amendment, which required a simple majority of the chamber.
Despite falling short, the amendment vote exposed a GOP rift as Husted, Sullivan and Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana refrained from voting for more than two hours, while Cassidy appeared to negotiate with GOP leaders. Cassidy, who lost his primary last month after the president endorsed his opponent, has been outspoken about his opposition to the fund. He ultimately voted against Schumer’s amendment.
Shortly after, another amendment related to the fund failed to secure enough support, in a 15 to 84 vote. That proposal, put forward by Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, would have redirected the money from the DOJ fund to fraud enforcement. Among Republicans, it was supported by Cassidy, Collins, Husted and Sullivan, along with Sens. John Cornyn of Texas, John Curtis of Utah, Joni Erst of Iowa, Jerry Moran of Kansas, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mike Rounds of South Dakota and Todd Young of Indiana. Three Democrats, Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire, voted in favor.
In the middle of the night, an amendment that would have redirected the fund to benefit members of law enforcement who defended the Capitol on Jan. 6 was defeated, 52 to 46. It needed 60 votes to pass. It was proposed by Cassidy and Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland.
Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky spoke for most Republicans who opposed the amendment, calling it a poison pill.
The Republicans who voted for it were Cassidy, Collins, Husted, Murkowski, Sullivan, and Tillis.
Democrats — and some Republicans — are forcing votes on a number of other amendments aimed at restricting the DOJ fund, which would provide taxpayer-funded payouts to individuals who alleged the federal government had been “weaponized” against them. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche testified before a House committee earlier this week that “we are not moving forward with the fund.” But his refusal to put anything in writing, and the president’s continued praise for the plan, have made some senators skeptical.
Senate Majority leader John Thune stood by Blanche’s comments, telling reporters as the vote-a-rama kicked off that the statement was “definitive.”
“I know that the president has mixed views about this, but the person who would set that up would be the attorney general,” Thune said.
Even with the assurances from the administration, Democrats have taken the opportunity to hammer Republicans over the fund.
Republicans were already forced to do away with funding related to the president’s renovation of the White House’s East Wing, where he plans to build a massive ballroom. The initial reconciliation package included $1 billion for the Secret Service for security related to the complex. But it was stripped from the final bill after pushback from a number of Senate Republicans.
The marathon vote series marks the beginning of bringing to an end a long saga over fiscal year 2026 government funding, which prompted a 43-day shutdown last fall, followed by a partial government shutdown earlier this year. With the rest of the government funded, Republicans are looking to close the loop on the final agencies, while guaranteeing they remain funded through the end of the Trump administration.
